How do/did USA diplomats view our beloved Rahul Gandhi (from primary sources)

May 12, 2019

= empty suit, light weight, lackluster leader, living on family inheritance etc…

But then, isn’t Rahul the ONE, the Messiah of the mAsses and the Prophet of dirty Profits – who can repair and cure the ills of even HELICOPTERS by boundless love, hugs, anger management, free advice, vipassana  and, um – meditating on the attributes of – wait, don’t bloody jump the gun – a Mango?

Oh well.

Even Saeed Naqui, a famous & ‘well connected’ Lutyens Journalist (father of the second generation Lutyenswali, a constant Congress/Islamist apologist and famous socialite of the ‘Ganga-Jamuni Tehzeeb’ fame, Sabah Naqui) had made very interesting (=scathing) observations on the surreality that is our beloved Rahul Gandhi. He has gone on record saying all the right wrong things about Rahul – while chatting with a USA diplomat who has promptly recorded it…

OK. This is a capture of a series of tweets – culled from a few of the wikileaks releases, along with my annotations. These releases were confidential/secret internal documentations that were filed by the New Delhi embassy diplomats of USA. They are very realistic & on the dot.

Here goes…

What a realistic & forthright ASSessment of our beloved, hateless Rahul Gandhi by the diplomats of USA!

empty suit, lightweight‘ etc & that jibe on ‘family inheritance‘ – and in all these intervening 12 years NOTHING has changed for the better for Rahul, poor thing, tch tch


The press is even now continuing with the ‘young blood’ narrative, though!

These jokers, many of them at least, feel that because he has a dimple, and goofs up enormously all the time and has FAILED in ‘Developmental Economics’ in his MPhil – he has the RIGHT to lead Bharat, and manage the nation’s economy! OMG!

In this secret memo of USA diplomats, as of 3rd March 2005, ‘RAHUL GANDHI: LACKLUSTER LEADER‘ – a recording of a chat with Saeed Naqui (a ‘well-connected’ Lutyens journalist) has been provided.

Now, on to the beautiful observations of  Saeed Naqui about our beloved Rahul, O Rahowl!

“…it is increasingly common knowledge that Rahul suffers from “personality problems” of an emotional or psychological nature that are severe enough to prevent him from functioning as PM” – says Saeed Saheb!

Says, he ‘lost his faith‘ in Rahul.

Actually things have become worse! I think, the whole nation has lost faith in this inveterate liar.

Rahul has failed as an MP” “has done nothing for UP except to make pro-forma appearances in Amethi, & has ‘made no impression on the people of the state.’

That was in 2005. Has ANYTHING changed till date?

Saeed Saheb was/is prescient. Rahul will never become Prime Minister

Priyanka… more intelligent and savvy – Gandhi dynastic politics had no future – Rajiv would never have won re-election had he not been assassinated

Rahul is far below even his father in political ability.

Well, well! This is really hard-hitting. Even Rajiv is not spared. Lovely.

But, the USA diplomats can also see the power of propaganda that could help Rahul.

In the mean time, the Lutyenswali Grand Ma’am Saba Naqui tweeted about the “new low of abusing Rajiv who is long gone.”

But then her OWN Father did the same thing, poor thing. She knows naught what she is doing!




8 Responses to “How do/did USA diplomats view our beloved Rahul Gandhi (from primary sources)”

  1. nparamasivam1951 Says:

    But Sir, I not agreeable to the following observation of Mr. Naqvi, which was quoted by you in your tweet – “Priyanka more intelligent and savvy”. This is a cruel joke that even Mr.Vadhra will not agree.

  2. Velmurugan K Says:

    நான் இவரை (Saeed Naqvi) ஒரு moderate முஸ்லிம் என்று நினைத்து இருந்தேன். ஆனால் சமீபத்தில் அவருடைய “Being the Other: The Muslim in India” நூலை படித்தேன். அதில் இந்திய பிரிவினைக்கு நேருவும் பட்டேலும் மட்டும்தான் முழு காரணம் என்கின்ற மாதிரி எழுதி இருந்தார், பிரிவினைக்கும் ஜின்னாவுக்கும் சிறிதும் சம்பந்தம் இல்லாத மாதிரி.

    • உண்மைதான். பெரும்பாலான விஷயங்கள் போல மிக அருகில் சென்றால் இளித்துவிடும் தன்மையுடையவர்தான் அவர். லுட்யன்ஸ் அடிவருடி.

      ஆனால் தாங்கள் இதுவரை படிக்கவில்லையென்றால் – Nisid Hajari அவர்களின் midnight’s furies புத்தத்தைப் பரிந்துரை செய்வேன்; அதில் ஒரளவு சமனத்துடன் இந்த பாரத-பாகிஸ்தான் பிரிவினைப் பிரச்சினைகளும் பின்புலங்களும் அலசப் பட்டுள்ளன.

  3. Velmurugan K Says:

    புத்தக பரிந்துரைக்கு மிகவும் நன்றி. புத்தகத்தை வாங்கிவிட்டேன், இந்த வார இறுதியில்தான் படிக்க வேண்டும்.

    நீங்கள் ஜின்னாவை பற்றி என்ன நினைக்கிறீர்கள். எனக்கு அவர் ஒரு ‘mixed bag’ மாதிரி தெரிகிறார். ஆயிஷா ஜலால் மற்றும் ஜஸ்வந்த் சிங்கின் ஜின்னா பற்றிய புத்தகங்களை படித்த பிறகு அது மிகவும் உறுதி ஆகிற்று. ஜின்னா தனிப்பட்ட முறையில் மத வெறியர் அல்ல என்றே நினைக்கிறேன், ஆனால் இஸ்லாமிய மத வெறியை தன்னுடைய அரசியல் லாபத்திற்காக பயன்படுத்தி கொண்ட ஒரு அரசியல் வாதியாகதான் தெரிகிறார். Venkat Dhulipala கூட பாகிஸ்தான் என்ற நாடு பிறப்பதற்கு மதமே காரணம் என்று விளக்கமாக எழுதினாலும், ஜின்னாவை மத வெறியர் என்று கூறவில்லை. I think Jinnah was a fascinating character. கேட்பதற்கு மன்னித்து கொள்ளுங்கள், உங்களுக்கு நேரம் இருந்தால் அவரை பற்றி விரிவாக ஒரு கட்டுரை எழுதுங்கள்.

    • Velmurugan K Says:

      //I think Jinnah was a fascinating character//

      After reading Midnight’s Furies, I come to think of Jinnah was a fallen man. During the 1930’s he completely changed. 1946 – 48வரை நடந்த ரத்தக்களரிக்கு ஜின்னாவே காரணம்.

      • So sweet of you, Velmurugan – you not only went ahead and bought the book – but also read it. I am so glad. :-)

        A lot of ‘his fall’ had to do with the facts that 1) His sister who was a rabid islamist was a significant influencer 2) He felt he was being neglected because the thought other younger people like Jawahar were being promoted 3) The unfortunate decision of Gandhi to support the Islamist Caliphate (via the Khilafat movement) gave him the idea that his path to power was totally achievable thru the constituency of muslims 4) The bending-over-backwards support given to him by the Brits.

        YES. Jinnah was very, very significantly responsible for the bloodshed. But, the seeds for such things are there in the rabid (and valid) interpretations of islam.

      • Velmurugan K Says:

        //His sister who was a rabid Islamist was a significant influencer//

        This is the first time I hear that she was Islamist (படிக்க வேண்டியது நிறைய இருக்கிறது, நான் வெறும் நுனிப்புல் மேய்ந்து கொண்டு இருக்கிறேன் என்று நினைக்கிறேன்).

        ஆனால் அவர் மிக கொடுமையாகத்தான் கொல்லப்பட்டதாக படித்தேன். I think she was beheaded (Rumored) on behalf of Ayub Khan. If it so then I guess It was poetic justice.

மேற்கண்ட பதிவு (அல்லது பின்னூட்டங்கள்) குறித்து (விருப்பமிருந்தால்) உரையாடலாமே...

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s